Updated on August 7, 2026 | 1 minute read | Tess Werling
Home > Resources > Why ROAS Targets Are Holding Back Your Best Products
ROAS is one of the most widely used Google Ads metrics, and it's very easy to understand: if you spend £1 and generate £8 in revenue, the account has an 800% ROAS. But revenue is not profit. For ecommerce retailers, that distinction is important, but it's sometimes lost in the sauce. Two products can have the same ROAS but very different commercial outcomes if their margins differ, and that's why margin-based bidding is becoming more important.
A ROAS target treats revenue as the main measure of success, which can work at a broad level but quickly becomes limiting when product margins vary.
For example:
On ROAS alone, Product B looks better. But once margin is considered, Product A may be more profitable and may deserve more investment. If your bidding strategy only chases ROAS, it may hold back products that could drive more profit.
Most ecommerce catalogues contain a mix of products with a mix of high and low margins. Some are used for acquisition while others are used to clear stock, and some have strong repeat purchase potential while others are one-off purchases.
A single ROAS target across your Google Ads account cannot reflect all of that.
This can create poor budget decisions, such as:
A high-margin product at 400% ROAS may be more valuable than a low-margin product at 800% ROAS. But if your target is set too high, the system may restrict the high-margin product before it has a chance to scale.
A high-margin product can often afford a lower ROAS because there's more profit in each sale, while a low-margin product may need a much higher ROAS to remain commercially viable. That's why the same target should not be applied to every product.
If your platform target is too blunt, your best products may not get enough room to grow.
Google Ads can optimise towards revenue and conversion value, but it does not automatically understand your full margin structure unless that data is passed in and used correctly. Even then, we see many advertisers still manage campaigns around blended ROAS targets because they're easier to report. The issue is that easy reporting doesn't always lead to better decisions.
CMOs and heads of ecommerce need to ask whether their bidding strategy reflects actual profitability, not just platform efficiency.
Margin-based bidding means setting investment decisions around the commercial value of each product.
That might involve:
The goal is not to ignore ROAS. The goal is to make ROAS more useful by adding commercial context.
ROAS targets can protect efficiency, but they can also hold back growth.
If every product is judged by the same target, your most profitable SKUs may not get the investment they deserve.
Margin-based bidding gives retailers a clearer way to align Google Ads with the outcomes that actually matter: profitable growth, not just higher revenue.
Bidnamic helps retailers move beyond one-size-fits-all targets by optimising at SKU level, making bidding decisions that reflect product performance, intent and commercial value.

